Bias correcting confidence intervals for a nearly common property
نویسنده
چکیده
An important problem in science is to determine when individual measurements taken under different conditions are measurements of a nearly common property. When they are, the proper and common practice is to combine these measurements into a single estimate. For example, when certifying standard reference materials (SRMs) several different types of measurement devices are commonly used. Each device has its own systematic error (bias) and it is not clear whether these devices are measuring nearly the same property. We say that devices are measuring nearly the same property if the population means from these devices are within the stated bounds on systematic error. It is assumed that each bias can be quantified so that a known bound on bias error can be calculated. This paper provides methods for testing whether these devices are measuring nearly the same property. The first method is based upon the usual bias correction to t-confidence intervals while the second, more powerful, method relies on a sophisticated bias correction to t-confidence intervals. If we do not reject the null hypothesis that the methods measure nearly the same property then techniques found in refs. l-3 can and should be applied to produce a single estimate as well as an uncertainty statement for the estimate of this nearly common property. We formulate the null hypothesis as stating that the means of the different measurements do not differ from a common value by more than the stated bounds on bias.
منابع مشابه
Multiple imputation for correcting verification bias.
In the case in which all subjects are screened using a common test and only a subset of these subjects are tested using a golden standard test, it is well documented that there is a risk for bias, called verification bias. When the test has only two levels (e.g. positive and negative) and we are trying to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the test, we are actually constructing a confi...
متن کاملNew Technical Efficiency Estimates with Improved Bootstrap Confidence Interval Coverage
Bootstrap confidence intervals on fixed-effects efficiency estimates from finite-sample panel data models exhibit low coverage probabilities, because the traditional estimate involves a "max" operator that induces a finite sample bias. Attempts to bootstrap confidence intervals for the traditional estimate have focused on correcting bias. Rather than addressing this bias at the bootstrap stage,...
متن کاملLocal Bootstrap Approach for the Estimation of the Memory Parameter
The log periodogram regression is widely used in empirical applications because of its simplicity to estimate the memory parameter, d, its good asymptotic properties and its robustness to misspecification of the short term behavior of the series. However, the asymptotic distribution is a poor approximation of the (unknown) finite sample distribution if the sample size is small. Here the finite ...
متن کاملSmall Sample Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for Long-Memory Parameter
The log periodogram regression is widely used in empirical applications because of its simplicity, since only a least squares regression is required to estimate the memory parameter, d, its good asymptotic properties and its robustness to misspecification of the short term behavior of the series. However, the asymptotic distribution is a poor approximation of the (unknown) finite sample distrib...
متن کاملEstimation in Simple Step-Stress Model for the Marshall-Olkin Generalized Exponential Distribution under Type-I Censoring
This paper considers the simple step-stress model from the Marshall-Olkin generalized exponential distribution when there is time constraint on the duration of the experiment. The maximum likelihood equations for estimating the parameters assuming a cumulative exposure model with lifetimes as the distributed Marshall Olkin generalized exponential are derived. The likelihood equations do not lea...
متن کامل